In response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision this morning on partisan gerrymandering, Assistant Majority Leader Chris Kennedy, who serves as the chair of the House State, Veterans, and Military Affairs Committee, issued the following statement:
“The Supreme Court’s decision today is devastating to our fundamental democratic principle of equal representation under the law, throwing the door wide open for states to advance partisan political gain over the interests of the people,” said Rep. Kennedy. “Over the past few years we have seen the Supreme Court erode the protections provided under the Voting Rights Act, and many states took swift action to restrict voting rights. Now politicians will be able to gerrymander with impunity, diluting the fair representation of underserved communities and drawing legislative maps to benefit their own parties.
“Thankfully, here in Colorado we have established guardrails to help prevent partisan influence in redistricting, but in much of the rest of the country, no such protections exist. It now falls to the states to step up and implement safeguards to ensure that voters pick their elected officials, not the other way around, and our core democracy is protected.”
The Supreme Court’s ruling today essentially declared that federal courts don’t have a role in protecting against political gerrymandering. In November 2018, Colorado voters overwhelmingly approved legislatively-referred Amendments Y and Z to task independent commissions with drawing electoral maps for state legislative and Congressional districts.
But the rancor belies the fact that at least one Republican lawmaker supported all but 19 of the 460 bills approved, meaning 96% won bipartisan support.
The broad agreement is not unusual given the large volume of minor legislation, but the degree to which Republicans sided with Democrats is noteworthy.
Half of the 40 Republicans in the legislature voted for 66% of the bills that passed this year.
The findings are part of a new analysis from The Colorado Sun that looked at the votes cast in the 2019 legislative session by all 100 state lawmakers. The numbers show the Democratic-led statehouse — the first after four years of divided rule — found plenty of middle ground despite partisan divides on big issues, such as oil and gas regulation, a red flag gun law, sex education, paid family leave and more.
Democrats voted in lockstep on most issues. And much of the bipartisanship is owed to one Republican: Sen. Kevin Priola, an Adams County lawmaker eyeing a tough reelection in 2020 in a swing district. Priola voted for 90% of the bills that the Demcoratic majority advanced in the session.
“Obviously, if you take Kevin Priola out of the equation, the (bipartisan) number goes down quite a bit,” said Senate Majority Leader Steve Fenberg, D-Boulder. “He is very much a member of their caucus. But he also partnered with us on several bills.”
Of the 441 bipartisan bills, 14 passed with only one Republican vote. Priola was the lone GOP vote in favor of seven of those, including a measure to tighten up reporting on campaign donations and another he co-sponsored to ask voters this fall to retain tax money collected above TABOR limits.
“I vote my district, and a lot of that comes from the tens of thousands of calls, conversations I’ve had with voters over the years,” Priola said, explaining his votes in an interview.
When weighing bills, he said he asks himself: “Would the average person at the door think this is reasonable and fair and thought-out and will work, or will the average person think this isn’t going to work?”
In all, nine Republicans in the House and Senate voted with the Democratic majority nearly 70% of the time or more, according to the analysis of voting records. The most bipartisan Republican in the House was Salida Rep. Jim Wilson, who voted in favor of nearly 72% of the bills that passed.
Gov. Jared Polis and Democratic legislative leaders made significant policy shifts in the 120-day lawmaking term, and emphasized their efforts to win GOP votes on legislation. Once he finished signing bills earlier this month, Polis celebrated the “really historic success” of the 2019 session and pointed out that “95% of bills that reached my desk were bipartisan.”
For several years now, growth has been the
number one issue I’ve heard about as I knock on doors across Lakewood. People
are worried about population growth and what it means for our historically
underfunded schools and transportation infrastructure. We have all seen the
traffic congestion on highways like 6th Avenue and C-470 and
thoroughfares like Wadsworth, Kipling, Union, Colfax, and Alameda, and we don’t
want it to get worse.
This week, Lakewood voters will receive mail
ballots asking them whether to support Ballot Question 200. I’m voting no, and
I hope you do too. Though I share many of the proponents’ concerns about growth
in our city, I feel that passing Question 200 won’t stop growth – it will just
increase sprawl and make Lakewood’s housing affordability and traffic problems
We already have a shortage of affordable
housing that can only be solved by true strategic planning. If passed, Question
200 will make it much more difficult to build new affordable housing and will
drive up rents and property taxes for people who already live here.
For the teachers, police officers,
firefighters, young professionals, and others who work in Lakewood but can’t
afford to live here, Question 200 will mean they have to drive in from
somewhere else. That means more cars driving in and out of Lakewood every day,
and thus more congestion on our roads.
So if not in Lakewood, then where? I’ve had
constituents suggest that growth can just happen east of Aurora, but that’s
just not realistic. If people are working in Lakewood, they’re not going to
want an hour commute every day. That means increasing demand for developments
in unincorporated Jefferson County that would sprawl out across the undeveloped
spaces that contribute to our views of the foothills.
That’s really the choice we face. If we pass
Question 200, we make Lakewood less affordable and increase sprawl and
congestion. If we defeat it, we can resume our thoughtful, collaborative, and
strategic planning process for the future.
I believe that we all want Lakewood to be a
community accessible to young families, seniors, and everyone in between. I
believe we all want to protect our beautiful parks, open spaces, and views. I
believe we all want safe neighborhoods and great public schools. I believe we
all enjoy having a growing number of unique restaurants, breweries, stores, and
other amenities right here in our own city.
And how about the revitalization that has begun
on West Colfax? I have loved seeing the emergence of art galleries and the
facelift on the old JCRS shopping center, but we’re still seeing too many
vacant units that could be filled by a new restaurant or store. And many of
northeast Lakewood’s residents have to drive a couple miles to reach the
nearest grocery store, which can be a real problem if you don’t have a car.
Why is that? It’s because businesses won’t move
into areas that don’t have enough residents. New multi-family housing in
northeast Lakewood – one of the growth areas designated in the Comprehensive
Plan – could make a big difference in continuing the West Colfax renaissance.
What if we had a new restaurant row on Colfax
instead of the growing number of storage units? Or retail establishments other
than dollar stores? What if we could be sure that our kids will be able to
afford to raise their families here? And that our parents will be able to
If we want to be thoughtful and strategic about growth, we must push our city council to continue the Development Dialogue, taking community feedback as they plan the right ways to grow. Passing Question 200 will not make growth more strategic – it will only increase sprawl and congestion while making Lakewood a less affordable place to live. Please join me in voting no.
The corridors of the gold-domed state capitol here are lined with busts and portraits showing what political power used to look like in Colorado. Nearly without exception, the figures depicted in that artwork are male.
But step onto the floor of the Colorado House, and you’ll see something entirely different. In the current legislative session, more than half of the state representatives — 34 out of 65 — are women. Seven of the 11 House committees are chaired by women.
Only once before and only briefly has any legislature in the country experienced a female majority in even one of its chambers. It happened in New Hampshire, where women held 13 out of 24 seats in the state Senate during the 2009-2010 session.
A decade later, there are two: Colorado and Nevada, where women not only constitute a majority in the Assembly, but also hold most of the seats in the legislature as a whole.
This is not just the aftereffect of the 2018 election, which saw record numbers of women running for office. Colorado’s groundswell for more female representation has been building for years, fueled by organizations such as the state chapter of Emerge America, which operates a sort of boot camp for women interested in running at the state and local level.Opinion | This exchange between a Democrat and a CEO should shape the 2020 campaigns
Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) grills JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who made $31 million last year, on how a low-paid bank teller is supposed to pay the bills. (Danielle Kunitz, Joshua Carroll/The Washington Post)
Kathleen Collins “KC” Becker, who got her start on the Boulder City Council, is the third woman in a row to serve as House speaker. “We very diligently recruit women, and train women to run, and hire women as campaign managers,” she said in an interview in her offices just off the chamber. “And so, all of this is intentional. It didn’t just happen that way.”
This year has also seen a record number of women in Colorado’s state Senate, 13 out of a membership of 35. Well over half the agency heads appointed by its new governor, Jared Polis (D), are female.
The campaign to curb opioid deaths stretched from Denver to Washington, D.C., this week, as Gov. Jared Polis signed new state laws and U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet introduced get-tough legislation on Capitol Hill.
At the Sobriety House treatment facility in Denver Thursday afternoon, Polis signed:
Senate Bill 8, to address substance use disorder treatment in the criminal justice system. The bill was sponsored by state Reps. Chris Kennedy, D-Lakewood, and Jonathan Singer, D-Longmont, with Sens. Kevin Priola, R-Henderson, and Brittany Pettersen, D-Lakewood.
House Bill 1009, to provide support for those recovering from substance use disorders, providing vouchers for housing assistance to some, creating standards for recovery residences and creating the Opioid Crisis Recovery Funds Advisory Committee. The bill was sponsored by Kennedy, Singer, Priola and Pettersen.
Senate Bill 19-227, a sweeping piece of legislation aimed at getting drug-overdose medication into schools, expanding the state’s drug take-back program and getting automated external defibrillator devices into more buildings. The bill was sponsored by Pettersen; Kennedy; Sen. Julie Gonzales, D-Denver; and Rep. Leslie Herod, D-Denver.
Senate Bill 228, to provide training and other measures for prescribers to address supply of opiates. The bill was sponsored by Singer; Sens. Faith Winter, D-Westminister; Dominick Moreno, D-Commerce City; and Rep. Bri Buentello, D-Pueblo.
Senate Bill 219, to reauthorize the Colorado Licensing Of Controlled Substances Act with a new requirement to separate the administration of the act from duties relating to treatment facilities that receive public funds. Changes also call for an online central registry for licensed opioid treatment programs to submit information to the state Department of Human Services. The bill was sponsored by Pettersen and Rep. Serena Gonzales-Gutierrez, D-Denver.
“This law is focused on people who are going through substance use recovery and are at the end of that spectrum,” Kennedy said in a statement. “Through this bill, we are trying to reintegrate these folks back into the community and break down the barriers they face, like access to housing.”
Singer stated: “The majority of people with a substance use disorder are currently in recovery today. Supporting recovery is the right thing to do, costing the state far less in the long run. This will play a huge role in ending the opioid crisis.”
On May 16 the governor signed Senate Bill 13, which makes any condition for which an opiate has been prescribed eligible for medical marijuana.
Meanwhile in Washington this week, Bennet introduced bipartisan legislation to hold opioid makers more directly accountable for the addiction crisis caused by their products.
Besides extracting more money from drug makers, the Opioid Crisis Accountability Act would hold top company officials criminally liable for violations, while toughening laws on illegal marketing and distribution.
Last Friday, the 2019 Legislative Session came to a close with a list of accomplishments that the Denver Post said would ensure the session’s legacy as “one of the most transformative in decades.”
It’s amazing how quickly 120 days go by. As soon as we learned the results of the 2018 election, we began crafting an agenda based on the concerns we heard and the promises we made while on the campaign trail. Then there was the drafting and stakeholding and revising and moving bills through committee meetings and floor debates. And then it was over!
Here’s what I heard on the trail: Lower the cost of health care. Invest in education, transportation, and affordable housing. Accelerate the transition to clean energy. Make our schools safer. Expand mental health access. Stand up for the rights of every Coloradan – voting rights, reproductive rights, rights to self expression, and more. Protect the clean air, clean water, and beautiful open spaces that make Colorado such a special place to live.
Democratic lawmakers ended their work reshaping Colorado on Friday, delivering on most of their campaign promises before the giant rubber band ball fell to mark the end of the session.
Sweeping changes on education, health care and the environment, coupled with a host of social policy changes such as a ban on gay conversion therapy and new gun control legislation, ensure the 2019 legislative session will be remembered as one of the most transformative in decades.
The General Assembly adjourned Friday night after one of the most conflict-filled legislative sessions in recent memory. The 120 days were punctuated with late nights, long-winded debate and lawsuits.
Yesterday we honored the memory of Dave Sanders who gave his life to protect his students at Columbine High School. My cousin was one of the students who made it out thanks to Mr. Sanders and I am grateful that we passed this resolution to honor a true hero.
By Joey Bunch (May 03, 2019)
C-470 from West Bowles Avenue to South Platte Canyon Road in Jefferson County will soon remind commuters of heroism in the face of the Columbine High School massacre 20 years ago.
The Colorado House unanimously approved renaming the seven-mile stretch near the high school the Dave Sanders Memorial Highway Thursday.
The resolution was sponsored by House Republican leader Patrick Neville, who was a student at Columbine that day, and Rep. Tom Sullivan, a Democrat from Centennial whose son Alex was killed in the Aurora theater shooting in 2012.
“I’m watching my future play out in front of me with each anniversary of Columbine,” Sullivan said.
Rep. Colin Larson, R-Littleton, represents the district where the high school is located. He remembered being just a few miles away at his home on April 20, 1999, when two students killed Sanders and 12 students were gunned down.
“It’s a little strange it took 20 years,” the freshman legislator said of the memorial for Sanders. “But this will be a good thing for our community. Everyone who goes to Columbine and the Ken Caryl area will see this highway every day and be reminded of a great man and great hero.”
Sanders was shot in the back as he herded students to safety and bled to death before rescuers could arrive.
Rep. Chris Kennedy, D-Lakewood, read a letter from his cousin Mike Rotolo, who was holed up in a a science classroom where Sanders died.
Rotolo recalled how Sanders told them to tell his daughters he loved them.
“That day Dave Sanders showed me and a science classroom full of 16-year-olds what true love is — selfless, unconditional love. That is what I choose to remember,” Kennedy said, reading from the letter.
Neville recalled his freshman computer teacher’s patience trying to teach him to type, to focus on the fundamentals even if it slowed him down until he mastered the skill.
Neville said he tries to channel that patience over his natural stubbornness still.
“I’m humbled that I’m in a position to be part of this,” he told the House.
Then he led a chant. Neville said, “We are …” and lawmakers from across Colorado added “Columbine.”
All 65 members of the House added their names as co-sponsors of the resolution.
In 2017, a group of Colorado legislators first convened the Opioid and Other Substance Use Disorders Interim Study Committee — or “opioid summer camp,” as Dr. Robert Valuck calls it.
For the last two summers while the Assembly was on recess, the lawmakers studied the opioid crisis and worked with experts like Valuck to develop legislation.
“None of these people voted straight party-line stuff,” says Valuck, who directs the Colorado Consortium for Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention and spoke at a recent conference on opioids. “It was really like, ‘Look, is this a sensible thing to be doing or not? … And is it going to really affect Coloradans in a positive way? Then let’s do it. If not, then don’t.’”
Below, we highlight several bills addressing the opioid crisis, all of which (excepting Senate Bill 013) came out of that “opioid summer camp.”
House Bill 1009
This bill, titled “Substance Use Disorders Recovery,” would expand the state’s housing voucher program to include people with substance use disorders. It would also require that recovery facilities have a state license, and create an “opioid crisis recovery fund” for settlement money the state receives from suing pill manufacturers.
Sponsored by Reps. Chris Kennedy, D-Lakewood, and Jonathan Singer, D-Longmont, the bill passed the House on April 27 and headed to the Senate, where Sens. Kevin Priola, R-Henderson, and Brittany Pettersen, D-Lakewood, are sponsors.
House Bill 1287
“Treatment for Opioids and Substance Use Disorders” would direct the Department of Human Services to implement an online behavioral health capacity tracking system, which would show available spots at mental health facilities and substance use treatment programs across the state. It would also create a grant program to fund substance use treatment programs in underserved areas of the state.
The bill passed the House, and was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 29. It’s sponsored by Reps. Daneya Esgar, D-Pueblo, and James Wilson, R-Fremont County, along with Sens. Priola and Pettersen.
Senate Bill 008
“Substance Use Disorder Treatment in Criminal Justice System,” also sponsored by Priola and Pettersen, would allow people who had been receiving medication-assisted substance use treatment in a local jail to continue that treatment after being transferred to the state Department of Corrections. It would also create a simplified process for sealing certain drug felonies, and jump-start additional responses to addressing substance use in the criminal justice system.
Reps. Kennedy and Singer are House sponsors. The bill passed the Senate and the House, but the Senate must approve amendments.
Senate Bill 013
“Medical Marijuana Condition Opioids Prescribed For” would add any condition for which doctors would normally prescribe an opioid to the list of “disabling conditions” that qualify for medical marijuana. Minors would need the approval of two doctors, and couldn’t smoke their prescription on school grounds.
The bill passed the Senate on Feb. 12, and the House on April 29. Sponsors include Sens. Vicki Marble, R-Fort Collins, and Joann Ginal, D-Fort Collins, along with Reps. Edie Hooton, D-Boulder, and Kim Ransom, R-Littleton.
Senate Bill 227
“Harm Reduction Substance Use Disorders” would explicitly authorize schools to carry naloxone, a drug that can reverse opioid overdoses. It would also allow hospitals to serve as syringe exchange sites, expand the household medication take-back program, and create mobile response teams to provide medication-assisted substance use treatment in jails.
The bill was sponsored by Pettersen and Sen. Julie Gonzales, D-Denver. In the House, it was sponsored by Kennedy, along with Rep. Leslie Herod, D-Denver. The bill passed and was sent to the governor.
DENVER – Colorado’s governor, lieutenant governor and a host of lawmakers and health care stakeholders on Thursday detailed the roadmap they plan to follow in order to try and reduce the cost of health care services across the state.
“Too many Coloradans have to worry about caring for themselves or a loved one, as well as whether or not they can pay the bills,” Lt. Gov. Dianne Primavera said. “Our roadmap puts us on a path toward lower health care costs for all Coloradans.”
Primavera is leading the Office of Saving People Money on Health Care. She and Gov. Jared Polis laid out a series of bills and other initiatives – both short- and long-term – they say will help keep costs down for Coloradans.
They praised the steps already taken in the state to reduce uninsured rates from nearly 16% in 2013 to 6.5% this year. But said that the falling uninsured rates haven’t led to lower costs, particularly in mountain counties and other rural parts of the state.
Polis praised the legislature’s passage of HB19-1001, the hospital price transparency bill that aims to study the cost of care in Colorado. He also urged lawmakers from both parties to back some of the measures he is supporting this session, including the establishment of a reinsurance pool, more regulations of certain emergency rooms, and a Canadian prescription drug importation program, among others.
Aside from the short-term goals, the governor’s office said some of its long-term goals including launching a state-backed health insurance option and expanding the rural health care workforce and behavioral health system across the state. Polis said the Behavioral Health Task Force would be established this month and would have a strategic plan statewide by June 2020.